Should I Vote Essay, Research Paper
T-TH 9:15-10:30 Does it Matter if I Vote? The 2000 presidential election is soon approaching, but should I really care? When the time comes to cast the ballot, most people either feel obligated or apathetic. As in any case, there are many sides to this argument; some reasons that I should vote include civic duty and sustaining the democracy for which our “founding fathers” fought. On the other hand, politicians can be self-serving, and taking the time to cast just one vote is not worth my time. In talking with others on the subject, it seems as if most people are sitting on the fence as well. While voting seems like the ethical thing for me to do, would I be making a difference? One of the reasons that I should vote is that it is my duty as a citizen to vote. The Constitution gives me the right, and therefore I should respect that privilege. Furthermore, it was the goal of our “founding fathers” to give us the right to participate directly in our government. Voting is the basic form of political involvement, yet one of the most important. Since becoming independent, the US has become a world power largely based upon a representative government. It can be argued that in order to stay on top, we must continue fulfilling our political obligations; obviously these are reasons I should vote. Despite the fact that in previous years politicians worked hard to guarantee basic rights and privileges, it is a different situation today. Nowadays, politicians are more apt to badger us for campaign contributions and votes. Instead of giving to us, they take for themselves. Moreover, they engage in mudslinging and more times then not are ambiguous in their stances on important matters. Why should I help them further their career, when I am not being helped? Why should I take the time to register to vote, become informed, and cast a ballot, if it is all for not? Based upon these reasons, I should not vote. Solving this argument would be beneficial because of its civic importance. No matter what stance I take, people would be affected. Since the U.S. is a “well-oiled” machine (in terms of economic and political status), it is not likely that this matter will cause immediate harm, but if more and more people question the political process, it will
Electoral College Vs Popular Vote Essay Research
Capitalisum Essay Research Paper We vote every
I worked at a polling place during the last local election. As the registration officer, I expected to be completely busy throughout the day. At times I was. However, according to the local area’s population, there were not nearly enough people voting. Obviously, not everyone who could vote actually did. This is acceptable to some extent. Low voter turnout is not such a crime. But when voter turnout dips dangerously low at less than 20%, it becomes a serious problem. The fact that this is a continuing and growing trend makes it critical. A solution to this problem is compulsory voting.
The history of democracy proves that compelling people to vote has worked before. In Ancient Athens, where democracy began, all male citizens over 18 years of age had to attend the Assembly. It was their duty to have their say and cast their vote. If a citizen did not attend or was late, he was marked with red dye and charged a fine. Why such Draconian tactics? People often led busy lives with other concerns. They needed to be reminded to participate in government matters. Therefore, I argue that having consequences for not voting could persuade people to become more involved.
There are many countries in the world that have mandatory voting laws. Some of these countries include Australia, Singapore, and Brazil. Consequences for not voting can vary from prison sentences, community service, to fines. Each community or country chooses which option works best for them. When people know that they have to vote, they become more informed about the candidates and the issues at hand.
Of course, the most important question to consider when discussing mandatory voting is whether or not voting is important at all. Does it matter if only a few people decide who a nation’s leaders should be? The answer to that question should be an overwhelming yes. It does matter. If only a few people select leaders, that makes a country into an oligarchy. Democracy means “power in the hands of the people” and this means all the people. The true meaning of democracy explains that citizens have both rights and responsibilities to their community. Voting is a part of civil responsibilities that must be fulfilled in a working democracy.
In closing, voting is a necessity. Compulsory voting is a way to make voting better. If it works for other countries, it can work for ours as well.
Follow Us on Social Media
Get more free essays
Most useful resources for students: Contributors Bio
Lona graduated from Los Angeles City College. While being a lecturer in several high school institutions Lona founded an online educational project Tutorsclass.Read more
I studied education and currently work as a tutor for school-age children. I've worked as a volunteer in many different international social projects and as a camp counselor every summer.Read more
Check your paper for free
On-line tool. No downloads
Easy and usable report
Only real editors
High quality TRY NOW
24/7 online tutoring
Help with testpreparation TRY NOW
Check your paper for mistakes
Grammar and spelling ckecker
100% free service TRY NOW
All SDSU scholarships on the market by using SDSU Scholarship Search require that you just post an essay on the internet.
Scholarship committees critique a wide range of purposes and should use the essays to differentiate applicants. Mainly because the big volume of candidates can make it unattainable with the committees to interview each individual prospect, a coherent and unique essay can be what distinguishes you from an alternate prospect.
The subsequent specifics is important to crafting a successful scholarship essay.Consider the topic
Read the essay prerequisites. Be aware any demands for that essay subject matter that could be different for the scholarship.
Plan your essay well before you publish:
Do we need to say this? Proofread, proofread, and proofread yet again!
All appropriate content are supplied by this site can you buy essays online at papersnetwork.net Our writers are glad that will help you with the educational papers.How to post your essay
Leave A CommentLATEST NEWS GET STARTED TODAY
“Always keep in mind that I started probably in the same position as you. I had no customers, no products, no business – and I had no idea what I was doing. I simply copied a successful business idea – tweaked it and applied it in my own way. That’s what COPY THIS IDEA is all about. (More)
Award winning entrepeneur
© All content copyright 2016 Andrew Reynolds. All rights reserved. The terms Andrew Reynolds, Cash On Demand and Copy This Idea are trademarks of Andrew Reynolds.
Even though there are estimated to be over a hundred and fifty million eligible voters in the United States, it is projected that in the upcoming Presidential election, ninety million voters will choose to not partake in voting. That is over half of the eligible voters opting out of their privilege of voting, a privilege that several other countries do not even have. I feel that every eligible voter should take advantage of the ability to vote, but only if they are informed on the important information of the election.
There are approximately 72 countries in the world that partake in democratic elections. Out of the estimated 196 countries in the world, that is only 36% of the world has the privilege of voting. So why, in a country with complete freedom of voting for anyone over the age of eighteen, do over half of the eligible voters choose to not vote? The excuse that one vote does not make a difference, is often used to explain the actions of people who choose not to vote. I feel that this is an untrue statement however, because every single vote casted in an election does indeed make a difference. In our country’s past, there have been several presidential elections that have been extremely close. For example, in the presidential election of 2000 candidate Al Gore barely lost the election to George W. Bush. A lot of people had a problem with the way that Bush ran the country, but if they had voted for Gore, he probably would have won. If at least some of the people who did not vote because they thought it would not make a difference would have chosen cast a vote in those elections, the outcome might have been different. A person should take advantage of their privilege to vote, especially if their only excuse is that one vote will not make a difference.
With an estimated ninety-million voters in the United States that will choose not to vote in the upcoming presidential election, the winning candidate will not truly embody the choice of.
Explore all your favorite topics in the SlideShare app Get the SlideShare app to Save for Later — even offline
Continue to the mobile site »
Double tap to zoom outEvery vote matters_v3.0
Share this SlideShare
LinkedIn Corporation © 2016
Should I Vote Essay, Research Paper
T-TH 9:15-10:30 Does it Matter if I Vote? The 2000 presidential election is soon approaching, but should I really care? When the time comes to cast the ballot, most people either feel obligated or apathetic. As in any case, there are many sides to this argument; some reasons that I should vote include civic duty and sustaining the democracy for which our “founding fathers” fought. On the other hand, politicians can be self-serving, and taking the time to cast just one vote is not worth my time. In talking with others on the subject, it seems as if most people are sitting on the fence as well. While voting seems like the ethical thing for me to do, would I be making a difference? One of the reasons that I should vote is that it is my duty as a citizen to vote. The Constitution gives me the right, and therefore I should respect that privilege. Furthermore, it was the goal of our “founding fathers” to give us the right to participate directly in our government. Voting is the basic form of political involvement, yet one of the most important. Since becoming independent, the US has become a world p
ower largely based upon a representative government. It can be argued that in order to stay on top, we must continue fulfilling our political obligations; obviously these are reasons I should vote. Despite the fact that in previous years politicians worked hard to guarantee basic rights and privileges, it is a different situation today. Nowadays, politicians are more apt to badger us for campaign contributions and votes. Instead of giving to us, they take for themselves. Moreover, they engage in mudslinging and more times then not are ambiguous in their stances on important matters. Why should I help them further their career, when I am not being helped? Why should I take the time to register to vote, become informed, and cast a ballot, if it is all for not? Based upon these reasons, I should not vote. Solving this argument would be beneficial because of its civic importance. No matter what stance I take, people would be affected. Since the U.S. is a “well-oiled” machine (in terms of economic and political status), it is not likely that this matter will cause immediate harm, but if more and more people question the political process, it will
The essays are ideal for those taking examinations in English Literature.
Is this sick or what? November 3rd 2000 over 100 million American voters took to the polls unaware that their votes wouldn’t matter. Al Gore won the popular vote and George W. Bush won the electoral vote; or did he? Something was not right in the state of Florida. The contest to become the 43rd President of the United States became a Supreme Court dispute over the way we vote. The guy who got the most votes in the U. S. and in Florida and under our Constitution (Al Gore) will lose to America's second choice (George W. Bush) that won the all-important 5-4 Supreme Court vote (2). How could this happen and was it fair? How does America’s subsequent choice become president? For one to fully understand what occurred last November and December you must know how the Electoral College works.
Under the Electoral College system, American voters do not elect the president directly. Citizen’s votes help elected state officials decide which nominee receives their state’s electoral votes. 100 senators, 435 representatives and 3 votes awarded to the District of Columbia make up all 538 electoral votes. Our 535 elected officials are, in theory, supposed to reflect the ideas of their constituents. Unfortunately there is not a law that calls for electors to vote according to their state’s popular vote. The 2000 election is an example of how it is possible for a candidate to win the nation-wide popular vote and not the win the presidency. According to cnn. com Al Gore won the popular vote with 50,456,169 ballots and George W. Bush only received 50,996,116(1). Al Gore won a lot of states by a landslide victory but all those popular votes add up to however many electoral votes a state had. George W. Bush, on the other hand, barely won some states but was still given all of the electoral votes. This may not seem fair but this is how the system works and it offered a close outcome in the 2000 election. Another possible reason why the election was so close is because of the popularity of third party candidate Ralph Nader. Like other third party candidates in history Nader offered an alternative to the Republican and Democratic Parties. This election could have been close because of Nader drawing votes away from both Bush and Gore. This is nothing new though; it has happened on at least two other occasions in history. An example of this is when Theodore Roosevelt's Progressive Party helped the Democrats wrest the White House from 20 years of unchallenged Republican supremacy. To a lesser degree this may also have occurred in 1992, as Ross Perot's candidacy probably hurt George Bush more than it hurt Bill Clinton (3). Third Parties should not be overlooked especially in close elections such as the one last year. Now that you know how the Electoral College works we can take a closer look into what exactly happened in last year’s election.
As previously stated, Al Gore won the nation-wide popular vote and George W. Bush won the electoral vote; therefore making Bush the legitimate president. However, the election was so close that every electoral vote counted. Al Gore received 266 electoral votes and George W. Bush won the race with 271 (This is 1 vote more than he needed to take the majority of 270) votes (2). However, there was a problem with the ballets in several counties in Florida. Something was amiss as the media prematurely announced that Al Gore had won Florida, they later came back and said George W. Bush had acquired the Florida’s electoral votes. I recall waking up the next morning learning that America was still trying to determine the nation’s 43rd president. This is when the courts got involved.
Florida’s Supreme Court decided on November 21, 2000 that the votes cast should be recounted (6). Al Gore was quoted saying, ”Democracy is the winner tonight (5).” Florida’s Supreme Court made the right decision; in essence they were saying a vote is a vote no matter if it’s for a Republican or a Democrat. In a country where we stress voting as a patriotic duty it is imperative that our government makes sure every vote is accepted. Whether a ballet is dimpled chad, hanging chad, or pregnant chad the intention of the voter is evident then the vote should be counted. Nonetheless, the United States Supreme Court disagreed and intervened the Florida recount.
The Florida Supreme Court was in the process of recounting votes and would have met their deadline if Justice Scalia and four of his fellow justices of the United States Supreme Court hadn’t stepped in saying some of the counts may not be legal (2). These five judges, along with Bush’s lawyers helped slow down the recount causing Florida to miss the December 12th cut-off date for congress to dispute the results of the election (2). The job of the Supreme Court is to make a decision without influence. It appears that the five justices that voted in favor to stop the Florida recount we predisposed to do so, whether it was right or wrong. It’s possible that some of the justices favored George W. Bush. Scalia’s two sons are both lawyers working for Bush and Thomas’s wife is collecting applications for people who want to work in the Bush administration (2). There are blatant suggestions of political partiality. The five justices that voted to stop the recount are in a great deal of trouble. The Oregon Democratic Party sanctioned an urge to impeach the five U. S. Supreme Court justices for their decision (5). This is the right thing to do considering these men decided the 43rd president. According to the Miami Herald, Gore won Florida by about 20,000 votes (excluding the butterfly ballot errors)(2).
According to Government Census in 1998, 18-24 year olds were the least likely to vote (4). I wanted to prove the statistics wrong and voted for Ralph Nader in attempt to help him perform well enough in the polls so that the Green Party would receive more federal funding and also as an alternative to the Republicrats Bush and Gore. But some people need to be convinced that voting makes a difference. There have been many programs to try and get teens to vote such as MTV’s “Rock the Vote” and the World Wrestling Federation’s “Smack Down Your Vote”. However, following this election I believe that many people, along with myself, are questioning whether or not their vote matters. The 2000 election was decided in the Supreme Court, not by the people and not even by the Electoral College. Gore wasn’t the only person who was cheated; the people who went to the polls were the real losers. In essence, if the government cannot convince Americans that their votes matter, there’s going to be a poor turnout at the polls in the years to come. I would like to see the five Supreme Court justices who terminated the recount impeached. I signed an online petition (http://www. petitiononline. com/mod_perl/signed. cgi? insure&1) just for that reason. States are sovereign and the recount shouldn’t have even been a federal matter. It was wrong to step in and discontinue the re-tallying of the Florida votes. They should suffer the consequences of their malicious actions. Justice cannot be done; our president is George W. Bush and until at least 2004 it will remain this way because of the actions of five judges.
Please do not pass this sample essay as your own, otherwise you will be accused of plagiarism. Our writers can write any custom essay for you!
1 July 2014. Author: Criticism
There is a certain adulation that goes along with smug moralism. The recipients of such adulation feel a certain pride in that they are somehow above everyone else, looking down from their perch from on high�better than all of us here on the pavement below.
Such is the case with the �Never Trumper� crowd; they turn their nose up at what they see as the unwashed masses�read: rank and file conservatives�with a combination of anger and contempt. �How could they vote for such a man?� they bellow, �He is so crude, insulting�and lacks the credentials of a true head of state!�
Their ranting exclude the fact that their arch rival, Hillary Clinton, has an agenda that is not only, to the conservative cause, disastrous, but they can be surer of her success of implementing her policies if elected, then Trump who, as a political amateur, may falter when push comes to shove.
For the conservative voter who is between the political rock and the left-wing hard place, the bottom line is this: they cannot be exactly sure what Trump will or can do if elected, but they certainly can be sure of what Hillary will do!
For the �Never Trumper� the fundamental issue is principle; sticking to your conservative beliefs no matter what the options. For them, Trump does not fit the bill. They will tell you that he has just recently become a Republican, and that his conservative credentials are weak, at best. On major issues like abortion and LGBTQ rights he seems to shift at times like a sandcastle in the wind.
However, the sobering fact is that one certainly can know where Hillary Clinton stands: Abortion just about at any time; from conception until the third trimester. An increase in the legitimization of the gay lifestyle, with no holds barred. A Globalist approach to foreign policy that will see the US engaged in more military adventures�and who knows how the Clinton Foundation, which is now being investigated by the IRS, will attach itself to her tenure in the White House?
Above and beyond all of this, the �Never Trumper� crowd must confront one large issue that has devastating implications: SCOTUS. The next President of the United States will most likely seat at least two Supreme Court Justices. Justices serve until they die. There is no doubt that Hillary will nominate far-left, law-creating judges to this bench. Thus, SCOTUS will be radicalized for an entire generation. Are �Never Trumpers� prepared for this? Are they still willing to stick their chests out and their noses up and �stick to principle�?
It has become a clich� to say that electing Hillary will be like another four years of Obama. This is to side step reality. No, it will not. It will be the end of the USA as we know it.
While many will say that Hillary is really a centrist with a radical left mask on, the fact remains that she will seek to satisfy her radical puppeteers, whether she believes in their cause or not. This is a political animal with no loyalties, except to her own cause: power�and lots of it.
Her foreign policy as President? We can only look at the track record. She voted for the Iraq war (as did many Republicans). A complete disaster that destabilized the Middle East and lead to the further advance of Islamic terror. She gloated over Gaddafi�s death, although this was a tyrant who knew he was beat and was cooperating with the west. Result: chaos in Libya. Then there was the Benghazi affair. Let us remind ourselves that an American ambassador was killed on her watch. �Nuff said?
Under a Clinton presidency, more illegal, un-vetted immigrants will be brought into the country during an unprecedented period of world terrorism. They will be greeted with open arms by liberals who see every illegal as a possible Democrat voter.
If the �Never Trumper� crowd is so concerned about the moral climate in our country, will they stop and consider what our country will be like after four or, perish the thought, eight years of Hillary? If they think they cannot recognize it now, just wait.
There is, to be sure, a certain attraction�even romance�about voting for a third party candidate. One supposes that many sentient, thinking voters have toyed with the idea. Again, the clich� that this is �the most important election of our lifetime� certainly plays true here. It may feel good to come out of the voting booth having voted for a third party candidate, with your morals and your principles seemingly untarnished. But what will they tell their grandchildren when they are old enough to see the debris field created by their lack of awareness?
Then there will be those conservatives that will sit out the whole election. By default, they are surrendering their cause, although they will feel elated that, in their thinking, their hands are clean.
No, this is not an election where one must choose between �two evils.� The road map is pretty clear for the moral and fiscal conservative.
Donald Trump may not be your traditional conservative, but it is better to vote for one who at least expresses the elements of common sense conservative principles, than to allow a radical heat seeking missile to hit its target�to the detriment of an entire country.
Joseph M Bianchi is a journalist and publisher based in Greenville, SC. He has written on a wide variety of subjects, from urban planning to theology. His books include, 21st Century Corinthians, Common Faith, Common Culture�and the novel, Unnecessary Noises.